ESA tests space batteries to reduce space debris dangers
European Space Agency (ESA) engineers have conducted a series of tests to help assess the risk of abandoned satellites exploding in orbit due to catastrophic battery reactions.
The three-year test campaign is helping assess the risk of abandoned satellites exploding in orbit due to catastrophic battery reactions. Extreme ‘abuse’ testing of the current generation of lithium-ion batteries for space took place in the test bunkers of France’s Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA).
The aim was to develop guidelines to ensure batteries aboard satellites stay safely inactive after the end of a space mission, helping to avoid satellite breakups, a major source of space debris.
ESA power systems engineer François Bausier said, "Of more than 250 known satellite explosions that have taken place in orbit, about 10 have been due to batteries. All the battery explosions in the past were from older technologies that are no longer used for new ESA missions."
Taking place as part of ESA’s Clean Space initiative, the testing came out of a larger focus on making satellites safe once their mission ends by powering them down fully.
More than 200 abuse tests took place on different types of battery cells and modules – meaning multiple cells connected together. These cells were either brand new or had been subjected to simulated space radiation and charged and discharged many times to age them.
The tests included a focus on the functioning of internal protection systems within the cells themselves in extreme conditions, such as internal circuit breakers or venting mechanisms in the event of over-pressure.
"Current lithium-ion batteries for space have never been observed to break up in flight, but they may well explode if thermally, electrically or mechanically abused. Therefore, we’ve subjected them to extremely harsh conditions to simulate what the batteries could encounter once a space mission concludes and a satellite is left drifting in orbit," Bausier explained.
Methods of destruction included external and internal short circuits, failures that could arise due to insulation issues, structural failures or manufacturing defects; other tests included overcharging leading to overheating and also direct overheating tests.
‘Overdischarge’ tests were also performed in order to investigate whether such a decharging method could actually be used to safely ‘passivate’ the batteries at their end of life.
Battery high temperatures – such as the ones that might be encountered when a drifting satellite languishes in orbital sunlight – can trigger very fast reactions, sometimes too rapid for protection systems to kick in.
Receive the latest developments and updates on Australia’s space industry direct to your inbox. Subscribe today to Space Connect here.